By accessing or using this site you accept and agree to our Terms and Conditions | As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
Inside this Book
If you make use of this material, you may credit the authors as follows:
Skuse Alanna, "Constructions of Cancer in Early Modern England", Springer Nature, 2015, DOI: 10.1057/9781137487537, License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
The study of early modern cancer is significant for our understanding of the period’s medical theory and practice. In many respects, cancer exemplifies the flexibility of early modern medical thought, which managed to accommodate, seemingly without friction, the notion that cancer was a disease with humoral origins alongside the conviction that the malady was in some sense ontologically independent. Discussions of why cancer spread rapidly through the body, and was difficult, if not impossible, to cure, prompted various medical explanations at the same time that physicians and surgeons joined with non-medical authors in describing the disease as acting in a way that was ‘malignant’ in the fullest sense, purposely ‘fierce’, ‘rebellious’ and intractable.3 Theories seeking to explain why cancer appeared most often in the female breast similarly joined culturally mediated anatomical and humoral theory with recognition of the peculiarities of women’s social, domestic and emotional life-cycles. Moreover, as a morbid disease, cancer generated eclectic and sometimes extreme medical responses, the mixed results of which would prompt many questions over the proper extent of pharmaceutical or surgical intervention.
Cancer, Early Modernity, Early Modern Cancer, England, Early Modern Medical Thought, Arsenic, Breast Cancer, Canker, Humorism, Medicine, Uterus
Rights | License
Except where otherwise noted, this item has been published under the following license:
If you believe that this publication infringes copyright, please contact us at email@example.com and provide relevant details so that we can investigate your claim.