By accessing or using this site you accept and agree to our Terms and Conditions | As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
Inside this Book
If you make use of this material, you may credit the authors as follows:
Hemer Oscar et al. (Editors), "Conviviality at the Crossroads", Springer Nature, 2020, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28979-9, License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Conviviality has lately become a catchword not only in academia but also among political activists. This open access book discusses conviviality in relation to the adjoining concepts cosmopolitanism and creolisation. The urgency of today’s global predicament is not only an argument for the revival of all three concepts, but also a reason to bring them into dialogue. Ivan Illich envisioned a post-industrial convivial society of ‘autonomous individuals and primary groups’ (Illich 1973), which resembles present-day manifestations of ‘convivialism’. Paul Gilroy refashioned conviviality as a substitute for cosmopolitanism, denoting an ability to be ‘at ease’ in contexts of diversity (Gilroy 2004). Rather than replacing one concept with the other, the fourteen contributors to this book seek to explore the interconnections – commonalities and differences – between them, suggesting that creolisation is a necessary complement to the already-intertwined concepts of conviviality and cosmopolitanism. Although this volume takes northern Europe as its focus, the contributors take care to put each situation in historical and global contexts in the interests of moving beyond the binary thinking that prevails in terms of methodologies, analytical concepts, and political implementations.
Social Sciences, Ethnology, Ethnography, Ethnology, Political Sociology
Rights | License
Except where otherwise noted, this item has been published under the following license:
If you believe that this publication infringes copyright, please contact us at email@example.com and provide relevant details so that we can investigate your claim.